Contagion, Testing and Mortality Rates


The distinguishing symptom of Covid-19 appears close to fulminant pneumonia. (Fulminant is a descriptor for any event or process that occurs suddenly and escalates quickly, and is intense and severe to the point of lethality). Otherwise described as 'severe accute respiratory syndrome) or SARS.


Numbers appear to be far, far, far, far lower than originally projected by ‘experts’ to cause panic stations:

The main source of information that claims contagion acceleration is the World Health Organization… a privately funded group, with fraud and corruption written all over it, who want to force vaccinations on us all.

Pandemic? What pandemic?

Here’s the News Story that got reported.

Check out Jon Rappoport’s articles: Corona: the case number game and the follow up article Corona: if they lied then, why wouldn’t they lie now? or watch his 2 hour video:

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the US front man for managing the “pandemic,” has just written an article that ought to be titled: I WAS WRONG AND THIS IS MY CONFESSION.

Fauci, New England Journal of Medicine, March 26, “Covid-19 — Navigating the Uncharted”:

“If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968)…”

In case there is any doubt, those “pandemic influenza seasons” of 1957 and 1968 did NOT result in any lockdowns. People went outdoors. They mingled. They sat in stadiums. They went to their jobs. -

Neil Ferguson’s Model

"This Ferguson Model is such a joke it is either an outright fraud, or it is the most inept piece of programming I may have ever seen in my life. There is no valid test to warrant any funding of Imperial College for providing ANY forecast based upon this model. This is the most UNPROFESSIONAL operation perhaps in computer science. The entire team should be disbanded and an independent team put in place to review the world of Neil Ferguson and he should NOT be allowed to oversee any review of this model.

The only REASONABLE conclusion I can reach is that this has been deliberately used to justify bogus forecasts intent for political activism, or I must accept that these academics are totally incapable of even creating a theoretical model no less coding it as a programmer. There seems to have been no independent review of Ferguson’s work which is unimaginable!"


Accuracy in question

“Results are for the identification of 2019-nCoV RNA. The 2019-nCoV RNA is generally detectable in upper and lower respiratory specimens during infection. Positive results are indicative of active infection with 2019-nCoV but do not rule out bacterial infection or co- infection with other viruses . The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease . Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities.” - CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel – Verification Requirements, page 50 of

"From “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel” [1]:

“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”

Translation: A positive test doesn’t guarantee that the COVID virus is causing infection at all. And, ahem, reading between the lines, maybe the COVID virus might not be in the patient’s body at all, either." - Corona: creating the illusion of a pandemic through diagnostic tests


  • New revised projected numbers show Corona contagion no different to common cold and flu
  • Yet the media itself is reporting wildly high numbers, showing footage of body bags, etc.
  • While the global economy is on lockdown due to corona panic, normal flu continues to kill just as many people each year without any social panic at all.

And deaths being reported seem dubious as follows…

Death Certificate for Corona


"COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate … where the disease caused OR ASSUMED to have caused OR CONTRIBUTED to death.

If the decedent had other CHRONIC conditions these conditions can be reported in Part II."

Where Part 2 =

“Part II: Enter other significant conditions contributing to death but NOT resulting in the underlying CAUSE GIVEN IN PART 1.”

To me this says that if someone has symptoms that can be assumed as attributable to Corona, then put Corona as the cause of death, never mind about the bunch of other symptoms that people are dying over every day… just put those in Section 2 (minor contributors).

It is at the medical professionals discretion to decide.

And with all the pandemonia going on, who wants to bet that ‘deaths by corona’ are being inflated? Possibly massively so.

I do.

So when we see tragic tweets like this of people losing family members… how do we really know it’s actually due to Covid-19 or for any other reason but assumed/attributed to Covid-19?

We don’t.


Coronavirus Bill slashes safeguards in death registration - “Once you remove all these requirements and start allowing people in the commercial business of death, who will have no connection whatsoever to the deceased or their family, the capacity for malpractice of various kinds to enter the process increases considerably”

People dying equals Coronavirus? An engineered virus? -