Questions around Plandemic featuring Judy Mikovitz

This page relates to the 30 minute part 1 preview of a future release video at https://plandemicmovie.com/ featuring Judy Mikovitz, PhD Virologist.

It has ‘gone viral’ and the status quo establishment has hit back hard against it.

A few articles published by the Establishment:

  1. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/05/fact-checking-judy-mikovits-controversial-virologist-attacking-anthony-fauci-viral
  2. https://vitals.lifehacker.com/if-you-found-that-plandemic-video-convincing-read-th-1843339002
  3. https://www.forbes.com/sites/tarahaelle/2020/05/08/why-its-important-to-push-back-on-plandemic-and-how-to-do-it/

Let’s break some of this down…

1. The ScienceMag Article Breakdown

Author bios at : Martin Enserink, Jon Cohen

Clips from the article with sub-bullet point rebuttals from me:

First the authors set up the conclusion:

  • many unfounded claims about the coronavirus that causes COVID-19
  • Mikovits claims the new coronavirus is being wrongly blamed for many deaths.
  • accuses Anthony Fauci … of being responsible for the deaths of millions during the early years of the HIV/AIDS pandemic
  • The video claims Mikovits was part of the team that discovered HIV, revolutionized HIV treatment, and was jailed without charges for her scientific positions
  • None of these claims are true.

The article then waffles on for ages about Mikovits history with various irrelevant points of fluff, but here are the key points specified:

  • she co-authored a paper in Science that suggested an obscure … virus (XMRV) caused chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) … Other researchers soon questioned the findings, and over the next 2 years, the paper’s claims fell apart.
  • Mikovits had an explosive breakup with WPI {Whittemore Peterson Institute}. The institute filed suit against her in November 2011 for allegedly removing laboratory notebooks … she was arrested … and jailed … prosecutors eventually dropped criminal charges against her in June 2012.

Finally the story (already more than 50% of the way down the page) gets to the actual point of the plandemic video:

Interviewer: Dr. Judy Mikovits has been called one of the most accomplished scientists of her generation.

Mikovits had authored 40 scientific papers and wasn’t widely known in the scientific community before she published the 2009 Science paper

40 scientific papers? So she wasn’t widely known before 2009. Ok. Does that somehow make it untrue that she is “one of the most accomplished scientists of her generation”?

How about 101 publications and 3,753 citations including 50 co-authors as shown on https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Judy_Mikovits up until 2014.

Interviewer: Her 1991 doctoral thesis revolutionized the treatment of HIV/AIDS.

Mikovits’s Ph.D. thesis, “Negative Regulation of HIV Expression in Monocytes,” had no discernible impact on the treatment of HIV/AIDS.

Ok well just one bit of possible conjecture against another. Here’s Mikovits 1991 thesis abstract: https://europepmc.org/article/med/1946356

Interviewer: At the height of her career, Dr. Mikovits published a blockbuster article in the journal Science. The controversial article sent shock waves through the scientific community, as it revealed that the common use of animal and human fetal tissues was unleashing devastating plagues of chronic diseases.

The paper revealed nothing of the sort; it only claimed to show a link between one condition, CFS, and a mouse retrovirus.

Mikovits: I was held in jail, with no charges.

The district attorney in Washoe county, Nevada, filed a criminal complaint against Mikovits that charged her with illegally taking computer data and related property from WPI. The charges were dropped, in part because of legal troubles faced by her former employer.

Ok so what is the authors point? Why did the author take up an entire paragraph to confirm that Mikovits was held in jail with no charges ?

Mikovits: Heads of our entire HHS [Department of Health and Human Services] colluded and destroyed my reputation and the Department of Justice and the [Federal Bureau of Investigation] sat on it, and kept that case under seal.

Mikovits has presented no direct evidence that HHS heads colluded against her.

So the authors point is that currently this is conjecture? What would the author accept as ‘direct evidence’? Does a lack of direct evidence prove that no collusion was done? Does anyone believe that people’s careers are not destroyed by politically motivated character assassinations all the time? Did the author read Mikovitz book or review the powerpoint file she provided to them?

Mikovits: [Fauci] directed the cover-up. And in fact, everybody else was paid off, and paid off big time, millions of dollars in funding from Tony Fauci and … the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. These investigators that committed the fraud, continue to this day to be paid big time by the NIAID.

It’s not clear which fraud and what cover-up Mikovits is talking about exactly. There is no evidence that Fauci was involved in a cover-up or that anyone was paid off with funding from him or his institute . No one has been charged with fraud in relation to Mikovits’s allegations.

Oh… ok. Let’s do a 2 second google search on behalf of the authors.

A couple of clips from Ernst Young research paper on rampant corruption in life sciences.

The current economic climate has meant that businesses need an even stronger corporate culture to monitor compliance and fight the risks of fraud, bribery and corruption.

According to our 2016 Global Fraud Survey,1 11% of company executives across all industries believe that it is common practice to use bribery to win contracts. This figure increases to 15% in the life sciences sector, which is the highest across all the sectors .

Characteristics that increase the risk of bribery and corruption Customers and influencers of life sciences companies are often public officials . In many countries, health care professionals (HCPs) or health fund administrators are employees of the government, or work at public institutions.

So let me get this straight… Mikovitz was arrested for taking home a notebook with charges later dropped entirely… and that’s a big deal? But Fauci has been part of the life sciences establishment for decades at the very top of power, but he is squeaky clean because he’s not been convicted (yet)… although he funded $3.7M to the very lab (apparently against the law) where the corona virus may have come from? And Fauci was involved in shuffling $81 million dollars from various programs into Zika virus research… and he’s on the record (as published by medscape.com) that “Bending the Rules of Science Can Save Lives, Says Fauci”.

Is Fauci a ‘public official’? He’s front and centre of the Trump corona task force. You can’t get much more ‘public official’ than that! Certainly a face amongst the hydra-headed snake of corruption in life sciences.

But we’re expected to believe that ‘no evidence’ means Mikovits is simply making shit up, where as because she took a notebook home, she’s morally reprehensible or untrustworthy?

Please.

And we haven’t even got to the good parts yet about Fauci or corona virus.

Mikovits: It started really when I was 25 years old, and I was part of the team that isolated HIV from the saliva and blood of the patients from France where [virologist Luc] Montagnier had originally isolated the virus. … Fauci holds up the publication of the paper for several months while Robert Gallo writes his own paper and takes all the credit, and of course patents are involved. This delay of the confirmation, you know, literally led to spreading the virus around, you know, killing millions.

At the time of HIV’s discovery, Mikovits was a lab technician in Francis Ruscetti’s lab at NCI and had yet to receive her Ph.D. There is no evidence that she was part of the team that first isolated the virus. Her first published paper, co-authored with Ruscetti, was on HIV and published in May 1986, 2 years after Science published four landmark papers that linked HIV (then called HTLV-III by Gallo’s lab) to AIDS. Ruscetti’s first paper on HIV appeared in August 1985. There is no evidence that Fauci held up either paper or that this led to the death of millions.

Again, ‘no evidence’ doesn’t mean it’s not true. I take her word over the authors word any day of the week and twice on sundays. This isn’t journalism. The authors have not presented anything from her case beyond the soundbites from the 30 minute introductory video. Nothing from her book. Nothing from her powerpoint. The points made are empty but sure do fill up a lot of words on the page. Maybe these writers get paid by word count.

She said herself, she was 25 years old, and part of the team that isolated HIV. The authors say her first paper was published 2 years after the first paper on HIV. So bloody what? Young scientists can be PART OF A TEAM as a junior assistant or whatever before they earn the wonderful honour of being named on some paper. Does not mean that she was not part of the team. Again, just pointless evasive, distracting, empty words from the author as attempt to discredit Mikovitz without actually dealing with the issues at hand. Which we are yet to come to…

Interviewer: If we activate mandatory vaccines globally, I imagine these people stand to make hundreds of billions of dollars that own the vaccines.

Mikovits: And they’ll kill millions, as they already have with their vaccines. There is no vaccine currently on the schedule for any RNA virus that works.

Vaccines have not killed millions ; they have saved millions of lives . Many vaccines that work against RNA viruses are on the market, including for influenza, measles, mumps, rubella, rabies, yellow fever, and Ebola.

The authors are vaccine fan-boys, obviously. But they missed the point again. She didn’t say there aren’t any vaccines on the market, she said there aren’t any that work.

Let’s look at evidence of millions of deaths by vaccine, because now we’re getting towards the good stuff:

Click on that link. Open the document. And read. Read until your stomach turns over because you realise this is not just a simple attempt to discredit a single PhD researcher. This is a challenge to our entire belief system about public services, health care, and social governance.

Here’s a 15-minute overview about vaccines.

But let’s not digress. We still have this article to finish unpacking.

Interviewer: So, I have to ask you, are you antivaccine?

Mikovits: Oh, absolutely not. In fact vaccine is immune therapy, just like interferon alpha is immune therapy, so I’m not antivaccine. My job is to develop immune therapies. That’s what vaccines are.

In another recent video, Mikovits is wearing a hat that says VAXXED II, which is a sequel to a film that links the mumps, measles, and rubella vaccine to autism, a debunked theory . She also repeats several claims made by people who are leading the antivaccine movement. In the PowerPoint presentation she sent to Science, she calls for an “immediate moratorium” on all vaccines.

This is my favorite part in all this. This is where the real magic of establishment propaganda happens.

The establishment adheres to single-dimensional thinking that collapses abstract rational thought. The authors have not taken the trouble to understand, or explain, the difference between ‘vaccines’ (1) and ‘vaccines’ (2), so let me do their job:

  1. Dictionary definition of vaccine: “a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases”
  2. What vaccine’s mean in allopathic medicine: The toxic chemical cocktail used to inject directly into people’s (and babies) bloodstreams with the supposed intention of a vaccine.

These two things are not the same. So while Mikovitz is pro genuine authentic safe proven vaccines (substances that stimulate antibodies and provide immunity’ she is AGAINST the current paradigm of toxic bloodstream injections.

Starting to get it?

Interviewer: Do you believe that this virus [SARS-CoV-2] was created in the laboratory?

Mikovits: I wouldn’t use the word created. But you can’t say naturally occurring if it was by way of the laboratory . So it’s very clear this virus was manipulated. This family of viruses was manipulated and studied in a laboratory where the animals were taken into the laboratory, and this is what was released, whether deliberate or not. That cannot be naturally occurring . Somebody didn’t go to a market, get a bat, the virus didn’t jump directly to humans. That’s not how it works. That’s accelerated viral evolution. If it was a natural occurrence, it would take up to 800 years to occur.

Scientific estimates suggest the closest virus to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, is a bat coronavirus identified by the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). Its “distance” in evolutionary time to SARS-CoV-2 is about 20 to 80 years. There is no evidence this bat virus was manipulated.

No evidence that bit virus was manipulated?

First, note that she said ‘family of viruses’.

How about this?

“The closest known relative of SARS-CoV-2 is a bat virus named RaTG13, which was kept at the WIV (Wuhan Lab). There is some unfounded speculation that this virus was the origin of SARS-CoV-2,” explains University of Sydney evolutionary virologist, Edward Holmes.

And of course the Wuhan Lab denies everything.

The institute at the centre of the controversy has repeatedly denied accusations of being the source of the pandemic. Back in March, head of bat coronavirus research at WIV , Shi Zhengli, explained that when she first received samples from early COVID-19 patients, she immediately did a thorough investigation at her department, finding no match between the viruses her lab had been working on, and COVID-19 patients.

Back in 2015 (around the time Fauci funded Wuhan Lab with $3.7M) a block was being put on ‘gain of function’ research in the US.

Do you think that controversial funding of $3.7M back in 2017 (of which reportedly at least $600k was paid to date) to the Wuhan Lab may possibly have had something to do with gain-of-function (modifying, enhancing, viruses)?

Gain of function (lab research to make viruses worse):

On Dec 19, 2017, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced that they would resume funding gain-of-function experiments involving influenza, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. - https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(18)30006-9/fulltext

The US National Institutes of Health, a government agency, awarded a $3.7million research grant to the Wuhan Institute of Virology

The lab is the center of several conspiracy theories that suggest it is the original source of the coronavirus outbreak

The institute experimented on bats from the source of the coronavirus

They were captured more than 1,000 miles away in Yunnan

Sequencing of the Covid-19 genome has traced it to bats to Yunnan’s caves

And yet the authors of the ScienceMag article claim “There is no evidence this bat virus was manipulated.”

They smokin’ some goooooood shiiitttt…

Interviewer: And do you have any ideas of where this occurred?

Mikovits: Oh yeah, I’m sure it occurred between the North Carolina laboratories, Fort Detrick, the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, and the Wuhan laboratory.

There is no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 originated at WIV. NIAID’s funding of a U.S. group that works with the Wuhan lab has been stopped, which outraged many scientists.

Because a Chinese lab can only continue work with US funding? Does it not occur to the authors that a Chinese lab also has funding from the Community Party of China?

Mikovits: Italy has a very old population. They’re very sick with inflammatory disorders. They got at the beginning of 2019 an untested new form of influenza vaccine that had four different strains of influenza, including the highly pathogenic H1N1. That vaccine was grown in a cell line, a dog cell line. Dogs have lots of coronaviruses.

There is no evidence that links any influenza vaccine, or a dog coronavirus, to Italy’s COVID-19 epidemic.

These authors avoid dealing with the germane information of the issue at hand, simply repeating their old canard ‘there is no evidence’. Of course evidence is important, and there are in deed many many evidences for the diligent citizen to find. As I have attempted to do in this rebuttal that has taken up a fair bit of my precious personal time.

Just think about what the authors failed to deny from Mokovitz statement:

Italy received an untested new form of influenza vaccine at the beginning of 2019 which, due to being grown in a dog cell line, could just as easily have included corona viruses inside the influenza vaccine. And then suddenly end of 2019 there are apparently lots and lots of corona virus related deaths in Italy.

But sure, there is no concern there according to the ScienceMag authors. The thing to focus on is ‘there is no evidence’ that the authors recognise meaning there is no scientific published paper. Because according to the authors, logic be dammed, evidence only comes from science papers.

Mikovits: Wearing the mask literally activates your own virus. You’re getting sick from your own reactivated coronavirus expressions, and if it happens to be SARS-CoV-2, then you’ve got a big problem.

It’s not clear what Mikovits means by “coronavirus expressions.” There is no evidence that wearing a mask can activate viruses and make people sick.

The authors openly highlight their ignorance of ‘virus expressions’ without bother with a moment of research.

“Medical Definition of expression: 1a: something that manifests, represents, reflects, embodies, or symbolizes something else the first clinical expression of a disease.”

OBVIOUSLY what Mokivits is saying is that if you have the virus and you are breathing it out then by using a mask you are trapping it in.

She didn’t say ‘wearing a mask can activate viruses and make people sick’, she is saying that if you are sick and have the virus then wearing a face mask will cause it to be trapped inside you and thus risk compounding your own infection.

But there it is again, the authors claim to ‘no evidence’. I don’t need a double blind placebo clinical trial published in an academic journal to understand that if a highly infectious virus exists that keeping more of it inside my body is not helpful.

Mikovits: Why would you close the beach? You’ve got sequences in the soil, in the sand. You’ve got healing microbes in the ocean in the salt water. That’s insanity.

It’s not clear what Mikovits means by sand or soil “sequences.” There is no evidence that microbes in the ocean can heal COVID-19 patients .

Ok… I’m glad this article is finished because their continued tactic of evasion is really draining.

Mikovits did not claim that microbes in the ocean heal covid-19 patients…

That they can twist what she said to fit their narrow minded model of health and immunity simply reveals the dead-end of mechanistic allopathic medicine.

Immunity is systemic, wholistic, with many factors that build vitality and protect us from disease of all kinds.

Sunshine, hugs, nutrition, nature. Mikovits was saying that maintaining our use of natural environments such as the beaches and oceans is good for our health, serves to protect our immune system, and therefore fight against any threat of viral infections.

Conclusion:

The authors Martin and Jon are 2-bit journalists at best, with political bias, and perhaps complicit in the establishments fraud. Time will reveal all as this story unfolds.

Is any of this conclusive either way?

Nope. But one thing is for absolute certain…

The establishments attack on Mikovitz is obviously superficial and evasive as it highlights none of the de facto fraud and corruption that is known to exist within the life sciences community… plus all of the evidence revealing the fake covid death statistics spewing from the trumpets of mainstream media, CDC, etc.

So take a listen to what Judy is saying and judge for yourself. No doubt more information will become available over time.

Remember, the video the media is bashing is just a preview to the Plandemic movie schedule for release later this year.

Think for yourself. Question authority.

Continue here with the the Greatest Opportunity in the History of the World.

Or let’s carry on with this establishment attack on Mikovitz with the LifeHacker article.

2. LifeHacker Article Breakdown

This article is brilliant.

It literally starts off perfectly.

It satisfies the readers quest for truth and advocates healthy skepticism.

It lasts up the reader for exactly what it claims to help them avoid.

Then it comes in heavy with its own unsubstantiated propaganda.

“Its website features anti-scientific conspiracy theories, including claims that strongly imply vaccines and cell phone towers are giving children Alzheimer’s disease. Its frequently asked questions page calls herd immunity “absurd” and says it’s “debatable” whether vaccines save lives. These are flatly untrue statements.”

“That’s not a payoff. That’s the normal way a lot of science is funded” an obvious non sequitur.

Just because that’s the way a lot of science is funded does not mean it’s not a payoff

“Mikovits is sadly under-informed if she thinks drug companies need to conspire with the FDA to pull cheap drugs from the market to make this happen. If a drug works, the obvious move is to enjoy the increased demand and charge more.”

Another non sequitur. There are indeed generic drugs that cost pennies that are blocked from use in US because of FDA regulation.

“Charging a ton for drugs is business as usual, and completely legal. You don’t need a conspiracy theory to explain it.”

Nor do you need anything but awareness to know drug companies protect profits through state lobbying and regulation

“She also mentions hydroxychloroquine as a potential COVID-19 treatment that is being squelched. Actually, there are 169 trials of it ongoing right now. It’s being used so widely off-label that the supply for people who need it for other conditions, like lupus, is in danger. And despite her claims in the video, there isn’t any solid evidence that it works—just hope.”

Wrong.

“Does staying inside weaken our immune systems?

No. Why would it? There is a theory that exposure to microbes while children are growing up can affect their immune function as adults, but there is no known phenomenon in which immunity fades when we stay inside. There are plenty of microbes inside our houses, anyway”

Total BS. Immune function requires sunlight, lymph circulation, etc etc

Plus: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.marketwatch.com/amp/story/guid/E00F1A9A-8FE9-11EA-9208-AF2E6FA5B5BC

“Does the flu vaccine make you more susceptible to the coronavirus? Not that we know of. There was no study done on the flu vaccine and COVID-19”

Half truth at best but absolutely journalistic lie given the demonstrable evidence to the contrary about coronaviruses.

“Do hospitals get more money if they diagnose a patient with COVID-19 or put them on a ventilator? Yes, because hospitals charge more for treatments that require more resources. “

Total sham.

It is not a resource based charge requested by the hospitals, it is simply awarded by Medicare.

Even the Pontifact website says

Medicare then pays the hospital a prescribed amount of money — regardless of what it actually cost the hospital to provide the care.

There isn’t a Medicare diagnostic code specifically for COVID-19. Using payment rates for similar respiratory conditions, Kaiser estimated the average Medicare payment at $13,297 for a less severe hospitalization and $40,218 for hospitalization in which a patient is treated with a ventilator for at least 96 hours.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/apr/21/facebook-posts/Fact-check-Hospitals-COVID-19-payments/

Rather than the author updating on currently available information and saying that she’ll investigate further, she is outright dismissing Mikovits with non sequiturs (things that don’t logically follow) and false information.

Totally dishonest journalism.